Closed MansMeg closed 4 years ago
Should we rename references
in
"references": [
"rubin1981estimation",
"gelman2013bayesian"
],
to citations
(or something else) to avoid confusion?
Thats a very good idea!
I now tried this out, but citation does actually not make sense. We are essentially listing references for the data rather than citations for the data and that is a semantic difference. So I suggest we call it references and reference_posterior to make the distinction clear.
In the database I also rename the "references" folder to "bibtex_bibliography" to try to make the distinction more clear.
Hmm, that's a good point about references
being better than citations
. I still think it can be confusing to have references
and reference_posterior
. Could we rename reference_posterior
to something else? Or perhaps rename references
to something like publications
or publication_references
?
Alright. I and Aki discussed this briefly. I agree that it may be slightly confusing, but we could not come up with a better solution so Ill stick with reference_posterior
and references
for now.
Now fixed.
Also add reference_expectations for mean, variances and covariance