Closed ideasrule closed 1 year ago
Thanks for the feedback.
PyStan 2 codebase was outdated and did not really work with the latest changes in Stan C++ side.
For any custom stuff, have you tried using CmdStanPy + ArviZ?
Discussion happens on the Stan forums. This issue tracker is for bug reports and documentation improvements. You were told this when you clicked on "New issue."
Discussion happens on the Stan forums. This issue tracker is for bug reports and documentation improvements. You were told this when you clicked on "New issue."
Not having multiple core functionalities IS a bug, as far as I'm concerned, and a very serious one. In addition, your description is not accurate. When I clicked on "new issue", I see "Blank issue: Please note that the Stan Forums should be used in most cases". Note "most" and not "all".
Thanks for the feedback.
PyStan 2 codebase was outdated and did not really work with the latest changes in Stan C++ side.
For any custom stuff, have you tried using CmdStanPy + ArviZ?
Thank you. I'm currently using pystan 2, but I'll try out CmdStanPy + arviz.
I've been using pystan 2, but recently upgraded to pystan 3. In my opinion, v3 is far, far worse than v2, to such an extent that it's nearly unusable. The "upgrade" felt like going from a new luxury car to a Ford Model T. Many critical features are missing:
IMHO, pystan 3 was a very bad idea. Having fewer lines of code is not a benefit if half of the mission-critical features are missing. If the features exist and I simply missed them, I'd appreciate a pointer to where I can find them.