Open andrjohns opened 1 year ago
bool
would essentially be syntactic sugar for int <lower=0, upper=1>
, so I don't think this would be a breaking change.
Well, I guess reserving the keyword "bool" would be, but we have a policy for that. true
and false
are already reserved.
Would it be tricky/breaking to add support for a
bool
/boolean
data type? All of the conditional/comparison operators require a boolean value, so users currently have to re-evaluate the condition at each call or rely on the implicit conversion from anint
type.It could make for cleaner syntax to be able to do something like: