TypedChainOfThought and ChainOfThought have divergent reasoning output fields.

[ko0stik]

On ChainOfThought in the source code, we can see that output field for explaining the CoT is named rationale.

On TypedChainOfThought, in this file, CoT explanation is named reasoning.

Is there a reason why those 2 are different or is it simply a matter of separate evolutions of the code? If it is the latter, would it be more advisable to avoid using the typed predictors?

🙏

[okhat]

Good point, we should streamline this. That said, it seems like a minor thing. Does it break any major things for you?

[ko0stik]

Absolutely not, I noticed this while working more closely with the reasoning output fields when I was switching between typed and regular. It is slightly confusing at most.

I tend to prefer typed predictors. Considering the massive overhaul that has been under discussion lately, my main concern was to make sure that what I implement is as future-proof as possible to avoid migrations later on.

Thanks @okhat , I appreciate your reactivity on my question!