Closed pscott closed 10 months ago
Hey! Can this issue be assigned to me?
@0xdorifto Yes feel free to take it
@tabaktoni thanks! I'll start working on it now.
@0xdorifto Yes feel free to take it
should we discuss if it's worth introducing the breaking change?
Not sure it's still early enough to change. Should be first validated by ArgentX, Braavos, ...
It's up here if you guys want to check it out ^
@janek26 @dhruvkelawala @yoga-braavos can you please give your input about this? 🙏
Will probably be able to close this after this one is closed https://github.com/starknet-io/get-starknet/pull/194
Will at the end be defined by this snip : https://community.starknet.io/t/snip-off-chain-signatures-a-la-eip712/98029#abstract-1
Resolved in favor of the snip, for further progress push change's on the snip
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. The official casing for
Starknet
is notStarkNet
anymore, butStarknet
. However, some occurrences ofStarkNet
can still be found, most notably in the TypeHash function: https://github.com/0xs34n/starknet.js/blob/384db9f3bfaf066dea43f60e49f255c9a4a28b63/src/utils/typedData.ts#L255-L256Describe the solution you'd like Replace every occurence of
StarkNet
withStarknet
Describe alternatives you've considered Keep
StarkNet
and dismiss this issue. I think it's still early enough to change toStarknet
though.Additional notes This introduces a big breaking change (: