Open acccelerated opened 3 years ago
I've been wanting to implement something like this for a long time. Definitely on my radar.
Would love to see this implemented as well. Might be able to help, as I've been looking for a Go project to contribute.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I'd like my files to be tidy and navigable on my filesystem but I don't want Stash to make destructive edits to my files.
Describe the solution you'd like I'd like to see a semantic FUSE filesystem implemented in Stash.
I feel a bit gauche making a feature request that's "I want this thing from this other software in your software" but I've not seen it in anything else. I use a tool which in addition to its main use offers this feature for music files it manages. The tool is made for and only compatible with a private community but the code is open source under MIT, also happens to be written in Go, and available to view here.
Here's the author describing the feature:
SMB or FTP access to the mounted filesystem would enable a Stash-lite consumption experience in best-in-class native apps on any platform in situations where a web browser might be impractical, suboptimal or impossible. SmartTV/STB is the most obvious use case but I can conceive of others. A mounted filesystem provides a single point of flexible, open-ended compatibility that will accommodate many niche or fringe use cases that fall outside of the browser/API but beyond Explorer/Finder/Nautilus in general.
I would love to see something similar in Stash.
Describe alternatives you've considered
884
This will be suitable for some users in some situations but one thing I like about Stash is that it does not seem at all interested in moving, editing, renaming or in any way altering my files. "Have a messy folder of files with incredible metadata" is perfect but people do want or need to have tidy folders on the filesystem. This approach obviates the need to actually interfere with files on the disk to provide that.
Explaining why metadata is superior to hierarchical directories to users of and contributors to Stash seems redundant. As desirable as tidy, browsable folders on the filesystem are many libraries are an awkward-at-best fit with conventional hierarchical directories even if Stash did rename their files. This approach is 'best of both worlds' way to give users tidy folders seamlessly integrating the power of Stash's metadata and excelling what would be possible with even the most tedious-to-maintain folders and hard link regime.