search

stat157 / background

0 stars 4 forks source link

Conference call with Luen #37

Open gnolnait opened 10 years ago

gnolnait commented 10 years ago

Hi all, I've received a reply from Dr. Luen about our request for holding a conference call with him during class so we can ask questions about his work and regarding our project. He has suggested scheduling the call at the beginning of class next Tuesday, November 19. Is that feasible for us?

joyyqchen commented 10 years ago

That sounds great! On Nov 14, 2013 4:05 PM, "gnolnait" notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi all, I've received a reply from Dr. Luen about our request for holding a conference call with him during class so we can ask questions about his work and regarding our project. He has suggested scheduling the call at the beginning of class next Tuesday, November 19. Is that feasible for us?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stat157/background/issues/37 .

rerock commented 10 years ago

If we are going to have a conference call on Tuesday, maybe we should plan ahead and make a list of the questions we want to ask Luen? The point of contacts from each group hasnt met for a while, maybe we should meet up first? To talk about what we are doing, the things we want to accomplish and our questions? @lauraccunningham @carlshan I guess i will send out an email, wish me luck ;)

carlshan commented 10 years ago

@wliang88 : Yes agreed, we should meet this weekend or on Monday!

tandrasfay commented 10 years ago

Our group (Quakers) wanted to ask whether it matters if we restrict our earthquakes to body-type magnitude like Luen did in his paper. (Mentioned on page 21).

gnolnait commented 10 years ago

is there a distinction in our data (body wave magnitude vs. moment magnitude)?

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:28 PM, tandrasfay notifications@github.comwrote:

Our group (Quakers) wanted to ask whether it matters if we restrict our earthquakes to body-type magnitude like Luen did in his paper. (Mentioned on page 21).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/stat157/background/issues/37#issuecomment-28666063 .

tandrasfay commented 10 years ago

In the original SCEC dataset there is but the csv file on dropbox doesn't say which magnitude type we are looking at.