Closed casperisfine closed 10 months ago
I will add testing in ruby 3.3 in another PR
Alright, after adding a few more empty methods to comply to the Transition
interface, it's now passing.
I believe that strictly speaking this is backward compatible, since the initial transition accepting any possible method was AFAIK not documented. However it's not impossible some users may need to fix their code if they were wrongly calling methods outside of the interface.
If we want to preserve backward compatibility for these projects, we can also define a method_missing
that just returns nil
.
I will add the release workflow and merge this PR.
Thank you very much 🙇
released
OpenStruct design cause it to have non-local performance impact, especially with JIT compilers.
See https://github.com/ruby/ostruct/issues/51 for full context, and it Ruby 3.3 OpenStruct usage raise a performance warnings:
In this case I don't really see any advantage of OpenStruct over a simple PORO.
cc @seuros