Closed carloslfu closed 6 years ago
A way of extending actionTypes
Can you expand on this? What are you looking to achieve? (Code samples would be appreciated)
For instance, on the Flickr example using the interpreter:
import { Machine } from 'xstate'
import { interpret } from 'xstate/lib/interpreter'
const m = Machine({
initial: 'start',
states: {
start: {
on: {
SEARCH: 'loading'
}
},
loading: {
onEntry: ['search'],
on: {
SEARCH_SUCCESS: {
target: 'gallery',
actions: ['updateItems']
},
SEARCH_FAILURE: 'error',
CANCEL_SEARCH: 'gallery'
}
},
error: {
on: {
SEARCH: 'loading'
}
},
gallery: {
on: {
SEARCH: 'loading',
SELECT_PHOTO: 'photo'
}
},
photo: {
onEntry: ['setPhoto'],
on: {
EXIT_PHOTO: 'gallery'
}
}
}
});
const i = interpret(m)
// This might be
/*
const i = interpret(m, {
actions: {
search: () => {},
updateItems: () => {},
setPhoto: () => {},
}
})
*/
i.onTransition(x => console.log(x))
i.init()
i.send('SEARCH')
i.send('SEARCH_SUCCESS')
i.send('SELECT_PHOTO')
i.send('EXIT_PHOTO')
// notice that here you got multiple logs like: "No implementation found for action type 'search'"
Link to the working code: https://stackblitz.com/edit/xstate-interpreter-flickr-example?file=index.js
Ah yeah, I previously discussed on Gitter the possibility of adding something like:
const predefinedMachine = Machine({ ... }, ...);
const overrideMachine = predefinedMachine.withConfig({
actions: { ... },
guards: { ... }
});
The overrideMachine
would have the same configuration as the predefinedMachine
, but the actions/guards would override the previously defined ones. Great for testing, etc.
Does that seem like what you'd want? Then the interpreter becomes:
const i = interpret(m.withConfig(...));
// ...
Yes, that's it. Thanks.
This is added in master as machine.withConfig({ actions: {}, guards: {} })
(see b2354a4). Will be released on xstate@next
soon.
Closing as it is on master and will be released in 4.0.
Bug or feature request?
Feature request
Description:
A way of extending
actionTypes
in the interpreter is needed. Is very common to use custom actions in statecharts, I want to take advantage of the new type features and add new action types as well as not to display a warn when I use it.(Feature) Potential implementation:
Maybe to have an
actions
option in theInterpreterOptions
.