yimmieg
commented
6 years ago Hi Shian,
Thank you so much for that suggestion. We have removed the supplementary.material folder from the repo history and created a separate repo for that in case anyone wants to reproduce the figures from our paper.
Best,
~Jimmie
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 3:13 AM Shian Su < Shian Su ( Shian Su notifications@github.com ) > wrote:
This repository is over 600MB in size when it should be significantly smaller.
du -ha | sort -h
reveals a very large.git folder. Using code from here ( https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10622179/how-to-find-identify-large-files-commits-in-git-history ) I see there used to be a large supplementary.material folder which no longer exists. I'd suggest you either republish this repository and discard the history or maybe do something with Github's instructions for removing files ( https://help.github.com/articles/removing-sensitive-data-from-a-repository/ ) and bfg ( https://rtyley.github.io/bfg-repo-cleaner/ ) to prune away these old files weighing the repository down.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub ( https://github.com/statgen/demuxlet/issues/9 ) , or mute the thread ( https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEUMf-zVk6GbjFQ5S-9rtWT2ZD2Kr0gRks5tG2C9gaJpZM4RRmjN ).
This repository is over 600MB in size when it should be significantly smaller.
du -ha | sort -hreveals a very large
.gitfolder. Using code from here I see there used to be a largesupplementary.materialfolder which no longer exists. I'd suggest you either republish this repository and discard the history or maybe do something with Github's instructions for removing files and bfg to prune away these old files weighing the repository down.