Closed VasLem closed 2 years ago
Thanks for the report. Can you provide an example link where you are seeing this problem?
Also, is there a typo here (should this be referring to, eg, ~300)?
General notes:
We're used in many different websites- some via tabix, others via custom backends. It's hard to say exactly where the problem is without knowing which tool you use.... but I'd start by looking at the steps where data is read and sent to the browser.
If this is for a private site, I can be reached at abought@umich.edu
for any direct links that you don't want to share on a public forum.
My 2 cents: I agree with @abought : I also use LZ and I have values way over 31
(even over 300
) and it works just fine:
No reply from original author after ~3 weeks. I'm going to close this ticket to keep the backlog clear, but feel free to reopen if there's anything we can do to be of assistance.
Hi, I would like to mention that there is an issue with the numerical processing of the -log10 p-values, the highest it gets is 31.38 . This causes a wrong report of the highest peaks to show up if higher peaks than this number exist.