Open lb15 opened 3 years ago
I am running into the same issue.
@lb15 , did you ever get to the bottom of this?
@Griffan , @hyunminkang , thank you for developing this tool! Do you have any insight on this issue?
Maybe the droplets have no reads observed overlapping with SNPs?
@ShaiberAlon @lb15 Did you find a way to solve it? I'm into the same trouble
Hi,
I'm using dsc-pileup and freemuxlet to identify donors/doublets of a two-donor mixture. I pre-filter the bam file using the popscle_helper_tools (https://github.com/aertslab/popscle_helper_tools) linked in other github issues. I find that for some of my samples, the output from freemuxlet (.best file) does not contain all the barcodes in the original barcodes.tsv file. I can see in the log file that all the barcodes are read into dsc-pileup, but slightly fewer are read into freemuxlet. I think they are being filtered in dsc-pileup, but can't find any info about why. Is this expected behavior and is there a way to track why these cells are removed?
Thanks!
Here are some relevant snippets of the log file:
and reading into freemuxlet. Can see that it is processing 16,616 droplets instead of the 16,695 that go into dsc-pileup.