Closed onealexharms closed 4 years ago
Hello! Glad dali is useful for you!
From looking at the distribute code, it sounds like you'd like to be able to override step
(which would be a good name for the new option I think). Currently step
is max dimension (depending on direction) + gap. I think it would be confusing to have both gap and manual step be in effect at the same time, so I think it would be best to make it so when you define a step
you're overriding both.
In fact, the necessary change is pretty minimal, could you please give a try to this (completely untested) branch? https://github.com/stathissideris/dali/tree/manual-distribute-step
The project now has a deps.edn
so if you're using deps instead of leiningen you can point to the commit directly.
Thanks! I only kept gap basically to avoid a bigger change :) but of course you're right that it'd be kinda weird.
I'll give that a try this weekend. Thanks again.
Perfect! Thanks :)
Alright, let's make it official then! The change was released in v1.0.1 (although now that I think of it, it should have been a minor version instead of a patch version). I'm always on the lookout for good dali examples, so if you end up making something you can share, I'd be more than happy to include it in the examples. And you'd get your name mentioned in the readme as a contributor!
Hi! Thanks for this library! It's exactly what we were looking for. (We is me and my project pair.)
We have a situation where we need to place things an objective distance apart, without regard for the width of the thing. We are thinking that adding an anchor-distance param to distribute that defaults to largest-object would solve our problem without creating backwards compatibility issues. The step amount would then be either the gap + the largest element (as it is now), or the gap + anchor-distance.
Would you be open to a pull request? And how do you feel about the approach and the names?