I also have a suggestion. It was a clever idea to add the N.2 sections with a deeper explanation. Unfortunately, there is still too much text on the N.1 sections with the models and the text is too small. If you were to publish/produce this document for more mainstream consumption, I would urge you to consider a larger font and bullet points with 1-2 sentences. You could add the other text either as a new N.2 and add N.3. In fact, N.3 could be called “For data geeks” since geek is no longer pejorative. (Yes, I understand that you could have gotten far more technical and “geeky” in the explanations, so that label is a bit of an exaggeration, but it will make people feel good about themselves and thereby increase the motivation to read the more technical information.) Alternately, you could include a “mouse over” option with the bullet points that has all the descriptions from the original N.1.
I also have a suggestion. It was a clever idea to add the N.2 sections with a deeper explanation. Unfortunately, there is still too much text on the N.1 sections with the models and the text is too small. If you were to publish/produce this document for more mainstream consumption, I would urge you to consider a larger font and bullet points with 1-2 sentences. You could add the other text either as a new N.2 and add N.3. In fact, N.3 could be called “For data geeks” since geek is no longer pejorative. (Yes, I understand that you could have gotten far more technical and “geeky” in the explanations, so that label is a bit of an exaggeration, but it will make people feel good about themselves and thereby increase the motivation to read the more technical information.) Alternately, you could include a “mouse over” option with the bullet points that has all the descriptions from the original N.1.