Open zalmquist opened 2 years ago
It looks like it is in both formats of the data. Not sure what happened.
Does this apply to the windsurfers data?
Yes. Both data sets.
Best,
Zack
Zack W. Almquist Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Statistics Senior Data Scientist Fellow, eScience Institute Training Core PI, Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology University of Washington Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Mathematical Sociology Website: http://depts.washington.edu/zalmquist
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022, 2:02 PM Michał Bojanowski @.***> wrote:
Does this apply to the windsurfers data?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/statnet/networkDynamic/issues/11#issuecomment-1043658084, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4ZAH725TZFPTZRSYRWBCDU3WECTANCNFSM5OMU2KRA . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hi Zach, I'm sorry I'm not up to speed on context here, looks like 16:19 is on the list for group 1?
Yeah that is correct. 16:19 should be flagged as part of group 1.
Best,
Zack
Zack W. Almquist Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Statistics Senior Data Scientist Fellow, eScience Institute Training Core PI, Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology University of Washington Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Mathematical Sociology Website: http://depts.washington.edu/zalmquist
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022, 4:10 PM Skye Bender-deMoll @.***> wrote:
Hi Zach, I'm sorry I'm not up to speed on context here, looks like 16:19 is on the list for group 1?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/statnet/networkDynamic/issues/11#issuecomment-1043738787, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4ZAHYFPAU67647ZCTGWNTU3WTABANCNFSM5OMU2KRA . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hi,
I have noticed that the vertex.names
match the "order of the vertices":
library(networkDynamic)
data("windsurfers")
a<-c(); for (i in 1:95){if(i!=windsurfers$val[[i]]$vertex.names) {a<-c(a,windsurfers$val[[i]]$vertex.names)}}; a
# NULL
Also that the nodes 16:18 are flagged as in group1, but 19 and many others are missing:
group1<-c(1:8,13, 16:19, 22, 28, 37, 39, 40, 46, 47, 51, 54)
a<-c();for (i in 1:95){if(windsurfers$val[[i]]$group1==1) {a<-c(a,windsurfers$val[[i]]$vertex.names)}};intersect(a, group1)
# [1] 1 2 16 17 18 39 40
Could it be possible that indices and vertex.names
have gotten mixed up somewhere?
I hope this helps to clarify the problem.
Best, Giacomo
Some code to reproduce the issue:
library(networkDynamic)
data("windsurfers")
a<-c();for (i in 1:95){a<-c(a,windsurfers$val[[i]]$group1)}; sum(a)
# [1] 18 The output should be 22
group1<-c(1:8,13, 16:19, 22, 28, 37, 39, 40, 46, 47, 51, 54)
a<-c();for (i in 1:95){if(windsurfers$val[[i]]$group1==1) {a<-c(a,windsurfers$val[[i]]$vertex.names)}}; length(intersect(a, group1))
# [1] 7 The output should be 22
group2 <-c(9, 10, 14, 15, 20, 21, 23:27, 29, 32, 33, 41:45, 49, 52)
a<-c();for (i in 1:95){if(windsurfers$val[[i]]$group2==1) {a<-c(a,windsurfers$val[[i]]$vertex.names)}};length(intersect(a, group2))
# [1] 9 The output should be 21
Per a question from Giacomo, ETCH I notice that the group labels have a small error,
The group labels should be (for vertex.names -- NOT the order of the vertices)
group1<-c(1:8,13, 16:19, 22, 28, 37, 39, 40, 46, 47, 51, 54) group2<-c(9, 10, 14, 15, 20, 21, 23:27, 29, 32, 33, 41:45, 49, 52)
It looks like 16:19 in Group 1 was dropped.
Thanks!
Zack