Closed arnetheduck closed 8 months ago
Very confusing PR name, because leaks already got checked in all the tests,
leaks are checked once per suite
currently - after this PR they get checked after every test
- that's the difference - ie the PR title follows the naming in unittest2
.
When leaks are tested once per suite, you don't know which test within a suite actually introduced the leak and have to look for it one by one - with this PR, we get a more accurate representation.
Very confusing PR name, because leaks already got checked in all the tests, so probably should be renamed. And problem not in leaks problem is in
all_tests
approach. When all tests combined into single package memory usage become enormous because Nim memory manager do not release memory.