Closed jangko closed 1 year ago
hmm, turn out the other func value
also regress for nim 1.2 and 1.4 but not tested before.
I'm all for green CI, but, in this case, is this just creating silent brokenness in pre-Nim-1.6?
My suggested response to https://github.com/status-im/nim-stew/pull/203/commits/1b2c0be6a00a9f05c8c6c14bc2e2f8ba77cb4b26 is more along the lines of https://github.com/status-im/nim-stew/pull/204 -- if it's known broken without feasibility of fixing it, then it's not really a supported target.
And, while it might be possible to fix this so that it still works on Nim 1.2/1.4, just, why?
is this just creating silent brokenness in pre-Nim-1.6?
this is an example of partial support - ie most of it works but compile-time has issues - worth keeping in mind here is that when we talk about supporting 1.6, most of the 1.6 releases actually don't work (only the newer ones).
fix #202