Open oskarth opened 2 years ago
*This issue is basically about cleaning up the process for Status specs similarly to what has been done for Vac specs**.
Currently we use the COSS model (https://github.com/unprotocols/rfc/blob/master/2/README.md) for change management.
However, we don't do so fully and have some ad hoc processes. This complicates things needlessly, around versioning, breaking urls, etc.
Implement it more fully and document that this is the case.
Specific things that stand out to me:
Also see https://github.com/vacp2p/specs/issues/234
See how it works for Vac RFCs here https://rfc.vac.dev/ and the required changes https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc/issues/235 See https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc/issues/235
*This issue is basically about cleaning up the process for Status specs similarly to what has been done for Vac specs**.
Problem
Currently we use the COSS model (https://github.com/unprotocols/rfc/blob/master/2/README.md) for change management.
However, we don't do so fully and have some ad hoc processes. This complicates things needlessly, around versioning, breaking urls, etc.
Proposed solution
Implement it more fully and document that this is the case.
Notes
Specific things that stand out to me:
Also see https://github.com/vacp2p/specs/issues/234
See how it works for Vac RFCs here https://rfc.vac.dev/ and the required changes https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc/issues/235 See https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc/issues/235