Open benjthayer opened 2 months ago
Those assets are showing in the watched address asset tab even if the current balance is zero - which is the correct behaviour.
@benjthayer why do you think it's ok to display tokens with 0 balances in the assets tab?
Those assets are showing in the watched address asset tab even if the current balance is zero - which is the correct behaviour.
@benjthayer why do you think it's ok to display tokens with 0 balances in the assets tab?
It's quite common in Wallets to display the assets the user has previously held when their current balance is 0. We don't want to show all assets in the token list, just those that the user has held and previously sent/spent. The user can manually hide these if they want to.
There's a few benefits to this:
The assets from watched addresses are currently being shown in other addresses.
For example, I have added this watched address which has (or has had in the past) balances of
MATIC
,WAMPL
, andWETH
. Those assets are showing in the watched address asset tab even if the current balance is zero - which is the correct behaviour.However, those assets are also appearing in my other accounts which have never had balances of those tokens - which is the incorrect behaviour. Each individual account should only show assets which that account currently hodls or has hodl'd in the past.
The watched address tokens should only appear in the assets tab of the watched address (and the All accounts assets tab if the user has opted to include that watched address' balances and activity).
Watched address containing the assets
MATIC
,WAMPL
andWETH
:Status created account incorrectly showing those same assets:
cc @Khushboo-dev-cpp