Closed mprakhov closed 2 months ago
It is probably another issue @mprakhov , the issue with app showing incorrect estimated cost on UI
https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/assets/82375995/b6dc85db-3185-4e18-ab52-1110274ef404
it was discussed and potentially fixed in https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/13892, maybe worth reopening?
it was discussed and potentially fixed in https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/13892, maybe worth reopening?
Yeah I remember that issue. I think we found that in the end, we couldn't fully fix, because the fees were always about 10x higher than the estimation could give us.
Was there anything we could do about it? cc @dlipicar @alaibe
@jrainville there is now an L1 fee that should be returned, by displaying this, you will have the real cost of a tx
It has been added by @saledjenic
@jrainville there is now an L1 fee that should be returned, by displaying this, you will have the real cost of a tx
It has been added by @saledjenic
Ok, so this issue should be fixed by our team? ie it's only this community minting part that is missing the L1 fee? Or the wallet function itself should be returning the full? @alaibe
I do recall that @endulab worked on adding L1 fees at one point. Do you think there was a regression?
well somehow u get that it is blocked, so there is something in the UI that prevent it. it is either because the total fees being displayed is incorrect or something else ?
At first what I see in the video is that the ETH asset is 14.11 USD, but across all networks, not only on opt or arb as said above, also minting token should happen on opt only, right? Anythow this is worth checking also maybe we can add this as a new type to the router?
After checking Mikhailo's logs: Optimism mainnet: walletBalance=0.0 ethValueWithL1Fee=0.000724732373525969 l1Fee=0.000389200000000000 Arbitrum: walletBalance=0.0 ethValueWithL1Fee=5.719641e-05 l1Fee=0.000000000000000000 It seems that the wallet balance is computed incorrectly. I will check it.
According to my discussions with @alaibe OP and ARB are ERC20 tokens. They are not ETHs which are bridged to Arbitrum or Optimism networks. In order to interact with contracts on concrete chains we need to have bridged ETHs. FYI @mprakhov @jrainville
Ahhh! How have I not caught it. I did find it weird that Mykhailo had OP
instead of ETH
.
I guess I'll close since it's a non-issue
Thanks for looking into it @endulab
@endulab mmm... can I exchange it to bridged ETHs using our wallet? I wonder how can I fund it correctly. What I did before - just sent OP token from my Binance wallet to the Status wallet
@endulab mmm... can I exchange it to bridged ETHs using our wallet? I wonder how can I fund it correctly. What I did before - just sent OP token from my Binance wallet to the Status wallet
@mprakhov you can withdraw ETH from Binance and select the Opt and Arb networks, that's what I do. It's probably the cheapest option, DEX bridges involving L1 are expensive.
Bug Report
Description
Based on the fee info, I have enough balance of OPT and ARB on mainnet, but I can't mint the owner token
Note: this can be related to incorrect displaying of the Fees, as I have a low amount of ARB and OPT
https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/assets/117639195/1142cada-d5e4-4896-ae5e-6a5e84091b8f
Steps to reproduce
Expected behavior
Owner token minted
Actual behavior
Can't mint due to not enough funds
Additional Information