Closed chaitanyaprem closed 2 days ago
:grey_question: | Commit | :hash: | Finished (UTC) | Duration | Platform | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
:heavy_check_mark: | 3313cbf2 | #2 | 2024-06-28 16:03:11 | ~2 min | linux |
:package:zip |
:heavy_multiplication_x: | 3313cbf2 | #2 | 2024-06-28 16:03:28 | ~2 min | tests |
:page_facing_up:log |
:heavy_check_mark: | 3313cbf2 | #2 | 2024-06-28 16:05:13 | ~4 min | ios |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | 3313cbf2 | #2 | 2024-06-28 16:06:34 | ~5 min | android |
:package:aar |
:heavy_check_mark: | 8f37d50f | #3 | 2024-06-28 16:08:16 | ~2 min | linux |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | 8f37d50f | #3 | 2024-06-28 16:08:28 | ~2 min | ios |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | 8f37d50f | #3 | 2024-06-28 16:08:41 | ~1 min | android |
:package:aar |
:heavy_check_mark: | 8f37d50f | #3 | 2024-06-28 16:51:53 | ~45 min | tests |
:page_facing_up:log |
Thanks for a quick fix! Looks like one of the tests is fixed, but the other one still feels bad 😢
![]()
Oh, this has passed locally. Odd that it failed here.
Added some randomness in contentTopic used and removed peerExchangeClient config so that test uses only fleet nodes. This should make it non-flaky. Ran 10 times locally and no failures noticed.
Closes #5439