Closed flexsurfer closed 5 days ago
:grey_question: | Commit | :hash: | Finished (UTC) | Duration | Platform | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
:heavy_multiplication_x: | ef93a8f5 | #5 | 2024-11-20 10:51:32 | ~2 min | tests |
:page_facing_up:log |
:heavy_check_mark: | ef93a8f5 | #4 | 2024-11-20 10:53:38 | ~4 min | windows |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | ef93a8f5 | #4 | 2024-11-20 10:53:53 | ~4 min | tests-rpc |
:page_facing_up:log |
:heavy_check_mark: | ef93a8f5 | #4 | 2024-11-20 10:54:05 | ~4 min | macos |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | ef93a8f5 | #4 | 2024-11-20 10:54:39 | ~5 min | macos |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | ef93a8f5 | #4 | 2024-11-20 10:54:58 | ~5 min | linux |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | ef93a8f5 | #4 | 2024-11-20 10:55:18 | ~5 min | ios |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | ef93a8f5 | #4 | 2024-11-20 10:55:48 | ~6 min | android |
:package:aar |
:heavy_check_mark: | 56d4bdc7 | #5 | 2024-11-20 11:00:17 | ~4 min | windows |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | 56d4bdc7 | #5 | 2024-11-20 11:00:36 | ~4 min | tests-rpc |
:page_facing_up:log |
:heavy_check_mark: | 56d4bdc7 | #5 | 2024-11-20 11:00:44 | ~4 min | macos |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | 56d4bdc7 | #5 | 2024-11-20 11:01:12 | ~5 min | ios |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | 56d4bdc7 | #5 | 2024-11-20 11:01:21 | ~5 min | macos |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | 56d4bdc7 | #5 | 2024-11-20 11:01:43 | ~5 min | linux |
:package:zip |
:heavy_check_mark: | 56d4bdc7 | #5 | 2024-11-20 11:02:11 | ~6 min | android |
:package:aar |
:heavy_check_mark: | 56d4bdc7 | #6 | 2024-11-20 11:28:46 | ~32 min | tests |
:page_facing_up:log |
Attention: Patch coverage is 46.66667%
with 8 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 60.92%. Comparing base (
735a422
) to head (56d4bdc
). Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.
Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
api/geth_backend.go | 46.66% | 4 Missing and 4 partials :warning: |
thank @igor-sirotin, i've added the description, for 2) on mobile it's not needed because we don't have sync implemented, for desktop it will work fine.
thank you @saledjenic i will create a task for mobile so we could research and improve that
On mobile we don't have KeycardPairing json File, so we are unable to provide a path to it, so for recoveryAccount we'll pass a parameter KeycardPairingKey which will be used instead of KeycardPairing json File, on desktop it will continue work as it is