Closed zxdawn closed 2 years ago
I am not sure that this will add much. Sun glint information is already included in the processing_quality_flags
(validity
HARP variable). And for ascending/descending you could perhaps use something like solar_zenith_angle<=90
(to only have the ascending part).
In any case, we don't have a good HARP variable to map these additional flags into. Ideally, all flags should have been in a single flag variable in the product. So if certain flags are important for filtering, I would recommend getting them added to processing_quality_flags
.
Thanks for the reply.
Here's the descending flag (value = 4) from the processing_quality_flags:
And, here's the result based on SZA>=90.
It seems the ascending/descending mode can't be easily determined from SZA only.
It is not a straight ascending/descending split, but it does split the orbit in two. Why would you need to know this explicit asc/desc split?
We are working on the Arctic NOx emission and there're some significant dividing lines in the monthly average NO2 map. It may be caused by the merge of descending and ascending data.
If you are splitting at the asc/desc split you will just get dividing lines somewhere else, so I doubt that that will fix it for you.
Em ... Here's an example of a monthly NO2 map using qa_value>=0.75 filter:
That dividing line (between dark and bright color) seems to coincide with the SZA==90 border. So, maybe picking ascending ones would fix it?
Have you tried using the solar_zenith_angle<=90
that I mentioned?
In the end, it is about not mixing different local times, not about having a clear split at the pole.
But can you move this question to forum.atmospherictoolbox.org? This is no longer a HARP issue, but more a 'how to' question.
Thanks, I moved this to the forum post and added the SZA<=90 results.
I discussed with Henk Eskes last week and we thought that the
geolocation_flags
is useful to filter ascending/descending data and determine sun glint. It would be great to add it to harp.