Open kgryte opened 1 month ago
Hi @kgryte , can I solve this?
@Ad11xx Thanks for volunteering to work on this. Please feel free to submit a PR implementing this feature.
Thanks a lot! if it is possible is there any file I can refer to regarding the code practices?
Yes, you should look at both @stdlib/iter/none-by
(which is a sink iterator) and @stdlib/iter/for-each
, which is a transform iterator. The package you are planning to add should be a combination of the two.
Description
This RFC proposes adding the package
@stdlib/iter/cunone-by
, which cumulatively tests whether no iterated value passes a test implemented by a predicate function. The returned iterator should be a transform iterator, continuing to iterate while source iterator values are available.The
predicate
function should be provided two arguments:Related Issues
No.
Questions
No.
Other
@stdlib/iter/none-by
Checklist
RFC:
.