search

stedolan / malfunction

Malfunctional Programming
Other
336 stars 19 forks source link

Missing installation step #2

Closed olleharstedt closed 8 years ago

olleharstedt commented 8 years ago

Hi!

Maybe you can add a missing installation step in the README, between opam install and malfunction compile ...? Like ocamlbuild -use-findlib or however you do it. Also, for me, it was not added to ocamlfind when I did the opam pin and installation, had to do it manually.

Regards Olle

stedolan commented 8 years ago

I use malfunction via an opam pin. What went wrong using pinning for you, exactly? Did malfunction install successfully? Was the malfunction binary available afterwards?

olleharstedt commented 8 years ago

I did a git clone, pinned the local folder and did opam update, opam upgrade. Installed without problem, but saw no malfunction binary.

stedolan commented 8 years ago

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Olle Härstedt notifications@github.com wrote:

I did a git clone, pinned the local folder and did opam update, opam upgrade. Installed without problem, but saw no malfunction binary.

— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/stedolan/malfunction/issues/2#issuecomment-235648596, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE3lY0emlV3BbbxzzEDcOorqFx2uYWPks5qZ4z1gaJpZM4JTrsh .

Is there a malfunction binary in ~/.opam/<switch name>/bin? Did you do opam config env after changing switch?

olleharstedt commented 8 years ago

Ah, yes, there is a binary there.

Yep, did the config env.