Closed mrocklin closed 8 years ago
My fork is here:
https://github.com/jonathanunderwood/python-lz4
I had been thinking the same thing, and would be willing to maintain such a fork. I'll try and contact @Steeve on twitter as I see he's active there.
There's also this fork which ports to the cffi:
hey folks, indeed I don't have time to maintain it
i'll be happy to add people as contributors to the project though
Thanks for replying @steeve. PyPi seems to be broken currently, but once it's working properly I'll register a username there and hopefully you can add me to the project there.
In the meantime, I've merged @mrocklin and my own changes into the master branch of my repo, and hopefully we can make a 0.8.0 release from that.
I'm not sure I qualify as a full collaborator (I haven't contributed nearly as much as @jonathanunderwood ) however, if you would like to add my accounts for maintenance reasons I'm @mrocklin both on github and PyPI.
Great to have you on board @mrocklin !
I've also now merged changes from @keeely to build on VS 2008. But I have no way of testing those, sadly.
pkg-config (setup.py) isn't there for Windows, but once I'd fixed that got a truck load of other warnings, __GNUC stuff needs to be #ifdef'ed out for win32. I'm not using this any more, so can't really justify the time to fix it, but perhaps I'll come back to it later. Thanks.
OK, I am now registered on PyPi, username jgu - it'd be great if @steeve could add me as a maintainer to the package on there.
Ping @steeve . Would you be willing to log into http://pypi.python.org and provide jgu
with ownership rights over the lz4 package?
there you go folks, i've added @mrocklin as maintaner here, and @jonathanunderwood as maintainer on pypi
Thank you @steeve !
@jonathanunderwood do you have a stable/tested version of python-lz4
with the recent changes that can be pushed up to PyPI in the near future?
my bad, i've added @jonathanunderwood as maintainer here (guess it makes more sense ?)
The main thing is that someone else has push access to PyPI. We can always devolve to decentralized git if necessary (indeed, I think that @jonathanunderwood has been operating this way for a while now.)
Thanks @steeve !
@mrocklin I have my own cloned/forked repo that is essentially what I've been pushing to the Fedora packages. What I propose to do is create a github organization called python-lz4 and create a repo under that also called python-lz4. To that organization I'll add all folks interesting in contributing. And I'll make a pypi release off it. But, it's time for bed here, so it'll happen tomorrow :)
Sounds like a good plan. Thanks for taking the lead on this.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, jonathanunderwood <notifications@github.com
wrote:
Thanks @steeve https://github.com/steeve !
@mrocklin https://github.com/mrocklin I have my own cloned/forked repo that is essentially what I've been pushing to the Fedora packages. What I propose to do is create a github organization called python-lz4 and create a repo under that also called python-lz4. To that organization I'll add all folks interesting in contributing. And I'll make a pypi release off it. But, it's time for bed here, so it'll happen tomorrow :)
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/steeve/python-lz4/issues/51#issuecomment-214922543
OK, I've finished the lift of the git repo and created an organization:
This is @steeve's repo with all of my commits on top.
I've sent invites to @mrocklin and @steeve to be owners. If you're uncomfortable being an owner and would prefer instead to be a member, you can reject the invite, and I'll send another inviting you to be a member.
OK, and I've successfully cut a new release on pypi, 0.8.1. So, we're up and running.
I find this library useful. Unfortunately it does not appear to be maintained.
@steeve are you actively maintaining this library? Would you be willing to grant others commit rights to this repository and maintenance/ownership rights to the PyPI name?
Alternatively, maybe we should consider an active fork. @jonathanunderwood where do you keep the fork used by Fedora?