Closed chris-wood closed 1 year ago
thanks for the interesting question. i think this will happen, let's keep this issue open, and list this on the integration list until then.
Sounds good! Would you mind sending a PR to add your implementation to the list?
done!
i did not remove it yet from libopaque, but there is now this: https://github.com/stef/liboprf/ - which also contains a threshold oprf!
please close this issue at your earliest convenience if you agree this solves the issue. or wait until the redundancy of the oprf functions is removed from libopaque. either way is good.
this should now be complete with this commit https://github.com/stef/libopaque/commit/a4209e3319718d1c72b9d1c2147ecd03a5e2ff97 - if you disagree please reopen this issue.
for reference my ordeal started at this commit https://github.com/stef/libopaque/commit/ed79da5b86a0940bdc3e4895d6fdd7d42c2e34f9
Is there interest in splitting out the OPRF implementation in this library to a separate repository? I'd like to list this implementation on the specification page. Alternatively, we could list this as an integration on that same page.