Closed sweeneytr closed 3 weeks ago
This would resolve https://github.com/stefankoegl/python-json-pointer/issues/48
was fun fighting Travis. Anyhow, sorry for the mangled work, I applied black
as an auto-formatter and it made the diff larger than I'd like, but I can't really put the genie back in it's bottle there. Will just leave it as is until complaints.
Thanks for the great work! If we drop <= 3.7 here, this will break stefankoegl/python-json-patch. Would you be up for looking into that as well?
Yes, I am all for it! I'll link it when done.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 14:59 Stefan Kögl @.***> wrote:
Thanks for the great work! If we drop <= 3.7 here, this will break stefankoegl/python-json-patch. Would you be up for looking into that as well?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/stefankoegl/python-json-pointer/pull/52#issuecomment-1347214352, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACDQ7E6MIMSISZRQNABQ7BLWM573BANCNFSM6AAAAAASQBNZAA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Versions prior to 3.7 are EoL, and the lack of access to
from __future__ import annotations
in <=3.6 make it not worth working around.Pypi stats shows there is still some 3.6 utilization, but as breaking 2.7 support is typically handled by a major version bump, and going from 3.6 -> 3.7 is trivial, the regular maintaince of "a major bump happened" should be enough for them to push to 3.7.