No idea if this is the appropriate place for this change, but seems to address the issue per the test I added.
This could be done other ways I think, but would require exposing more internal API - so I went for the least evasive solution.
Happy to iterate on this if there is a better approach.
Naive fix for #106.
No idea if this is the appropriate place for this change, but seems to address the issue per the test I added. This could be done other ways I think, but would require exposing more internal API - so I went for the least evasive solution.
Happy to iterate on this if there is a better approach.