Closed Teko012 closed 1 year ago
Thanks! I will take a closer look later today.
Originally there were two reasons why I started looking into this: some of the commits made by actions were Co-authored-by
by the action itself (with the old email format), and it also showed up as github-actions[bot] and github-actions[bot] committed
. I looked at git log
, and I noticed that the actual commit author email was the one with the ID included.
If you look at the API, the user was created on 2018-07-30T09:30:16Z
, a year after they started using their new format. You can also see the id
there.
So I think the right email to use would be the one with the ID, but you could double check it of course to see if you see the same behaviour in workflows, just to make sure :)
Thanks for the explanation. I think that make sense to merge this PR and align it the behaviour of this Action with the "pattern" GitHub uses for the noreply-email adresses for GitHub accounts.
Will merge this to master
now and tag a new version in the next couple of days.
Some people are using main
in their workflows. Maybe some users will report weird behaviour because of this (probably not but you never know)
GitHub uses the new email format by default at commits when the
github-actions[bot]
is being used. This should bring it inline with that.