I am interested in differential microbiome networks. I have networks before and after treatment. I expect the difference between the two networks to be subtle, i.e. the treatment does not have a very strong impact on the microbiome. I know that because when searching for differentially abundant microbiota with ANCOM and other techniques, I do not get any significant hits.
NetCoMi offers a large number of algorithms for network construction, each with its own set of parameters (how to filter taxa, how to deal with zero counts...).
How could a meaningful workflow look like? Is the idea of NetCoMi to go through a large number of algorithms and parameter sets until some combination of method and parameters sets detects significant hits? Or to try go through a very large space and try to find a consensus?
I am interested in differential microbiome networks. I have networks before and after treatment. I expect the difference between the two networks to be subtle, i.e. the treatment does not have a very strong impact on the microbiome. I know that because when searching for differentially abundant microbiota with ANCOM and other techniques, I do not get any significant hits.
NetCoMi offers a large number of algorithms for network construction, each with its own set of parameters (how to filter taxa, how to deal with zero counts...).
How could a meaningful workflow look like? Is the idea of NetCoMi to go through a large number of algorithms and parameter sets until some combination of method and parameters sets detects significant hits? Or to try go through a very large space and try to find a consensus?