Closed rgieseke closed 3 years ago
Merging #968 (e6bec3f) into master (8ad10b5) will increase coverage by
0.00%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.:exclamation: Current head e6bec3f differs from pull request most recent head ab8be66. Consider uploading reports for the commit ab8be66 to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #968 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.32% 88.32%
=======================================
Files 80 80
Lines 7586 7587 +1
Branches 2455 2455
=======================================
+ Hits 6700 6701 +1
Misses 859 859
Partials 27 27
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/codecs/jats/index.ts | 95.87% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8ad10b5...ab8be66. Read the comment docs.
Thanks, @rgieseke this looks great. I'm going to merge as is and if needs be we can tackle the more complicated scenario of a figure with multiple images and diverging licenses some time later.
:tada: This PR is included in version 0.118.0 :tada:
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:
Here is an attempt at reading the permissions/license of a figure in JATS analogous to the main article license.
I'm not entirely sure how a figure with multiple images and diverging licenses should be handled:
https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/1.2/element/permissions.html
On https://jats4r.org/permissions there are examples with repeated
<permissions>
elements:I would think however that it's better in such a case to attach the different licenses the individual
<graphic>
elements.Handling multiple
<permissions>
could probably be added toencoda
but handling only one license doesn't require much code changes :slightly_smiling_face: (I tried for a bit but not sure if it's worth adding.)