Open wdesprats opened 1 year ago
Good idea! I totally agree, it would be much cleaner and easier to maintain. Thanks, will do!
misycmb_par was introduced to replace misycmb[par] in e63e4db. However, cmb_y_in is still used in pyxover.main() for file naming in BELA case. Some adaptation might be needed to only pass misycmb_par.
The sets in pyXover.py (misy) are hard coded, and depends on the instrument name. The combination number is passed as argument, but could the combination be directly chosen outside of Pyxover main?
For instance, passing misycmb[par] instead of par (= int(cmb_y_in))?