In using the library, I found that I want to deconstruct ParseResult using named fields rather than positional; also, it is not considered a good practice to leave DU fields unnamed.
So I'm suggesting we look at those changes, and consider if they are aligned with the style of the library.
If so, I can spend some time in reviewing the documentation and doing similar stylistic adjustment in some of the code examples, if desired.
In using the library, I found that I want to deconstruct ParseResult using named fields rather than positional; also, it is not considered a good practice to leave DU fields unnamed.
So I'm suggesting we look at those changes, and consider if they are aligned with the style of the library.
If so, I can spend some time in reviewing the documentation and doing similar stylistic adjustment in some of the code examples, if desired.