Closed deepak1556 closed 10 years ago
This looks like it's ripped right out of level up. If we're going to feature parity, why not just make Sophist level up compatible?
Also, tests are failing :(
you are proposing level-sophist ?
Yes, a level-sophist
wrapper would be better.
i left them if users are gonna shift from levelup to node-sophist, so they might expect similar features.
I've got a branch with my primitive stream support in it. I'll push it here and let you see what I'm thinking.
Here's my beginnings of Stream support: https://github.com/stephenmathieson/node-sophist/tree/wip-streams
Thats way better and simpler!! , my bad trying hustle up things . sorry for the trouble, i will try out on your level-sophist proposal :) Thanks!
No worries, glad to have someone interested in this library :)
I don't use level-*, so I'm not all that comfortable trying to maintain compatibility with it. I'd be happy to change things around to support usage with LevelUP (e.g. #set
-> #put
, #delete
-> #del
, refactor gte
, etc.), but it's not a high priority for me. Let me know what needs to be changed for level-sophist
and I'll see what I can do :)
if this is ok i will further improvise it, thanks!