Closed pcarbo closed 5 years ago
@stephens999 We already have dscquery
and dscreval
. If you feel strongly, we could change the names of all the functions to dsc_
.
well it would be good to be consistent, and i would indeed support this change. (we could continue to include the old functions for backward compatibility)
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 8:25 AM Peter Carbonetto notifications@github.com wrote:
@stephens999 https://github.com/stephens999 We already have dscquery and dscreval. If you feel strongly, we could change the names of all the functions to dsc_.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/stephenslab/dsc/pull/195?email_source=notifications&email_token=AANXRRNR6OEBXV7WJ5FWEITPVVOFRA5CNFSM4HNHTVY2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODVRZSFA#issuecomment-493066516, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANXRRPH6UR4SPUY4OKYBSTPVVOFRANCNFSM4HNHTVYQ .
@gaow If you are okay with this change, I will incorporate it into the Pull Request.
When this pull request is merged, we will be able to close Issue #180 and Issue #182.
i'm wondering about dscread instead of dscread... as a general convention i like dsc better than without _