Closed stephens999 closed 5 years ago
Further thought on this, I think my suggestion was misguided. It is better to have a lower threshold, so we don't remove something that is of potential interest, and let the user decide having been presented the results.
However I don't think we should justify the current choice as a widely used threshold
Oh great! Yes indeed default threshold is subjective, but I also believed that lower threshold is better. Was reluctant to change to r^2 0.8 (r 0.9) because it feels a bit too high.
However I don't think we should justify the current choice as a widely used threshold
what would you suggest then (and why)? DAP-G's suggestion is r^2 0.25 but maybe you do not think it is a good "widely used" (outside context of fine-mapping) threshold either.
i'd suggest we leave default threshold as is for now and just document what the default threshold is. no need to say it is widely used.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:11 AM gaow notifications@github.com wrote:
Oh great! Yes indeed default threshold is subjective, but I also believed that lower threshold is better. Was reluctant to change to r^2 0.8 (r 0.9) because it feels a bit too high.
However I don't think we should justify the current choice as a widely used threshold
what would you suggest then (and why)? DAP-G's suggestion is r^2 0.25 but maybe you do not think it is a good "widely used" (outside context of fine-mapping) threshold either.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/stephenslab/susieR/issues/57#issuecomment-431358194, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABt4xcE37J_XsIABZWa_yU7p4Dh83l-vks5umc-VgaJpZM4XulrV .
fixed by changing documentation
I think we should use r^2 0.8 as the default
first, that is a more usual default for "high" correlation in association analysis
second i think it is more appropriate for general use. Any default will be subjective, but the current default is very low IMO.