Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Can you paste the relevant log entry? (The GC code might be helpful too, if
there are not too many visitors.)
To avoid such situations, you may routinely pass the GPX output through
GPSbabel which usually finds XML issues, too.
Does this happen with GeoToad release 3.14.9? What about ruby 1.8.7?
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 10 Apr 2012 at 1:05
GC code is GC1CNZN, relevant log is below. Will experiment with other version
in the next days.
<groundspeak:log id="1393073474">
<groundspeak:date>2010-03-13T07:00:00.000Z</groundspeak:date>
<groundspeak:type>Found it</groundspeak:type>
<groundspeak:finder id="3280307743">shushyaz&foxy</groundspeak:finder>
<groundspeak:text encoded="False">FOUND CACHE HERES MY LIST<br />D-1;CC'S COOL CUT OFF CACHE;GC1HNVF;9-10-09<br />D-1.5;WOMBAT WALK;GC1BY3F;8-31-09<br />D-2;RABBIT FLATS WASH;GC1NMAJ;8-13-09<br />D-2.5;CACHING WITH MY UNCLE;GC15F2E;10-3-09<br />D-3;BOLDER BOULDERS;GC1H0YG;9-13-09<br />D-3.5;YUCCA CACHE;GC23HK4;2-27-10<br />D-4;ANOTHER HOODOO;GC1DDMF;8-30-09<br />THANKS FOR THE CHALLENGE</groundspeak:text>
</groundspeak:log>
Original comment by ch.ri...@googlemail.com
on 10 Apr 2012 at 7:27
Any chance to retrieve the corresponding part of the cache page (cdpf.aspx_*)
from the file cache directory? Thanks in advance
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 15 Apr 2012 at 6:14
I have found that the "offending" log entry ist still available among the last
10, so I created a GPX file for it, and passed it through gpsbabel. No
complaints, although gpsbabel seems to have a slightly different idea of what's
allowed:
GeoToad output fragment:
<groundspeak:log id="1393073474">
<groundspeak:date>2010-03-13T07:00:00.000Z</groundspeak:date>
<groundspeak:type>Found it</groundspeak:type>
<groundspeak:finder id="3280307743">shushyaz&foxy</groundspeak:finder>
<groundspeak:text encoded="False">FOUND CACHE HERES MY LIST<br />D-1;CC'S COOL CUT OFF CACHE;GC1HNVF;9-10-09<br />D-1.5;WOMB
AT WALK;GC1BY3F;8-31-09<br />D-2;RABBIT FLATS WASH;GC1NMAJ;8-13-09<br
/>D-2.5;CACHING WITH MY UNCLE;GC15F2E;10-3-09<br />D-3
;BOLDER BOULDERS;GC1H0YG;9-13-09<br />D-3.5;YUCCA CACHE;GC23HK4;2-27-10<br
/>D-4;ANOTHER HOODOO;GC1DDMF;8-30-09<br />THANKS
FOR THE CHALLENGE</groundspeak:text>
</groundspeak:log>
gpsbabel's version:
<groundspeak:log id="1393073474">
<groundspeak:date>2010-03-13T07:00:00.000Z</groundspeak:date>
<groundspeak:type>Found it</groundspeak:type>
<groundspeak:finder id="3280307743">shushyaz&foxy</groundspeak:finder>
<groundspeak:text encoded="False">FOUND CACHE HERES MY LIST<br />D-1;CC'S COOL CUT OFF CACHE;GC1HNVF;9-10-09<br />D-1.5
;WOMBAT WALK;GC1BY3F;8-31-09<br />D-2;RABBIT FLATS WASH;GC1NMAJ;8-13-09<br
/>D-2.5;CACHING WITH MY UNCLE;GC15F2E;10-3-09<br /&g
t;D-3;BOLDER BOULDERS;GC1H0YG;9-13-09<br />D-3.5;YUCCA CACHE;GC23HK4;2-27-10<br
/>D-4;ANOTHER HOODOO;GC1DDMF;8-30-09<br />TH
ANKS FOR THE CHALLENGE</groundspeak:text>
</groundspeak:log>
Can you try to pass the GPX file through gpsbabel (something along the lines of
"gpsbabel -i gpx -o gpx -f inputfile.gpx -F outputfile.gpx") before feeding it
into your software? This might help identify the culprit...
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 15 Apr 2012 at 6:29
Ok, I grabbed again and tried to pre-convert using GPSBabel. GPSBabel rejected
the file:
GPX: XML parse error at line 5351 of 'D:\temp\gt_bloomfield_nm-y5.0.gpx' : not
well-formed (invalid token).
This is the line causing the error, now related to GC1E4FH:
<groundspeak:text encoded="False">FOUND CACHE HERES MY LIST<br />#0;20 CENTS
CACHE OF NEW MEXICO;GC13QK8;10-3-09<br />#1;ONE WAY;GC1J83G;7-23-09<br />#2;TWO
RIVERS;GC1VH7N;7-18-09<br />#3;5EV3N;GC22RX8;1-9-10<br />#4;GOLLUM FOURTH
RIDDLE;GC1ZBGY;10-18-09<br />#5;5K FOR TUX;GC1QAMV;10-11-09<br
/>#6;65&330;GC1FCR7;9-10-09<br />#7;ALMOST 37 108;GC1KEJ9;3-27-10<br />#8;805
BUG ZAPPER;GC1HCEV;9-1-09<br />#9;2009 FOCOGEO SUMMER EVENT;GC1WJ89;8-22-09<br
/>WILL I THOUGHT I HAD IT BUT I,LL HAVE TO TRY AGAIN. POSTING SO I DONT HAVE TO
TYPE AGAIN.<br />FINALY GOT IT TODAY<br />THANKZ FOR THE CHALLENGE<br /><br
/>[This entry was edited by shashyaz&foxy on Saturday, March 27, 2010 at
10:03:14 PM.]</groundspeak:text>
Removing the ampersand in 65&330 fixed the problem.
I do have the cdpf file of the cache, let me know if you need that.
Original comment by ch.ri...@googlemail.com
on 15 Apr 2012 at 7:11
"&330;" indeed doesn't make sense to me, but I cannot check where this comes
from since GC1E4FH seems to be a PMO cache.
GC1FCR7 is called "65&330" - which in itself wouldn't create a problem if the
user hadn't added a semicolon at the end of it.
Can you try the following patch...
--- o/output.rb 2012-03-28 10:42:58.000000000 +0200
+++ n/output.rb 2012-04-17 15:54:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@
text = CGI.escapeHTML(str)
# CGI.escapeHTML will try to re-escape previously escaped entities.
# Fix numerical entities such as Pateniemen lämpökeskus
- text.gsub!(/&([\#\d][\d]+;)/, "&\\1")
+ text.gsub!(/&(\#[\d]+;)/, "&\\1")
# Fix hex entities too
#text.gsub!(/&#x([0-9a-fA-F]+);/) { "&\##{$1.to_i(16)")
text.gsub!(/&(\#x[0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F]+;)/, "&\\1")
... and tell me whether that fixes the issue?
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 17 Apr 2012 at 2:03
This fixed the problem, "65&330" now correctly translates to "65&330".
Thanks!
Original comment by ch.ri...@googlemail.com
on 17 Apr 2012 at 8:35
Good to know that! (I haven't seen any negative effect of this patch in my own
searches yet, and don't expect any, so this will go into trunk as well.)
Doing some investigation, I found that this bug had been there for quite some
time. It somehow sneaked in between 3.10.2 and 3.10.3, and a closer look shows
that commit r562 (dated 2010-01-29) must have been the culprit.
Surprising that nobody found it before...
Now if someone writes a comment containing "Ĭ" what would happen?
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 18 Apr 2012 at 9:04
Let's see... :)
Original comment by ch.ri...@googlemail.com
on 19 Apr 2012 at 7:50
Will be in 3.16.0
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 2 May 2012 at 1:22
3.16.0 has been released
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 25 May 2012 at 12:28
Pattern matching is still causing problems, this time with encrypted hints.
Try parsing GC2RC17
Original comment by ch.ri...@googlemail.com
on 27 May 2012 at 3:54
Opening http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?wp=GC2RC17 in the
browser, I cannot see any hint at all - but there's the "Decrypt" button, so
there must have been something, right?
Going to the print page
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cdpf.aspx?guid=3ffe9f71-5f4a-4b5c-bbb7-f63bb2f6f1
f2&lc=10, I can also see the "Additional Hints" frame - which contains four
line breaks only, which would result in a row of bars - which may look strange
but is all GoeToad can make of it.
If you can see more information: How did you get it? (Shouldn't depend on the
browser as the HTML is the same...)
I remember that GC has changed handling of HTML stuff inside hints a few weeks
ago, might this be the reason you don't see the hint anymore (if there was any
before)?
Temporarily re-opening...
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 29 May 2012 at 8:04
What's the current state of this problem? No response for 8 weeks
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 23 Jul 2012 at 8:43
Closing (until another bug of the same type shows up)
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 10 Aug 2012 at 7:23
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ch.ri...@googlemail.com
on 10 Apr 2012 at 5:42