Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
A second inspection of search results (nearest.aspx) reveals that there are no
longer links to GUIDs in the list but URLs of the form
/geocache/${wid}_${mangled_title}.
GeoToad traditionally used the GUID values to go directly to the "print with
logs" pages (cdpf.aspx) - which are now out of reach.
On the other hand, WID and GUID searches still seem to work - with my somewhat
patched-up local version at least (which still surprises me, so the "guts" of
the new page don't have changed too much).
Until I find a way to expand the two-level search as implemented in Geotoad to
a three-level one, all other searches won't work any longer.
Unfortunately, I'm in the final stages of an important project at the moment (a
state that will last for a couple of weeks), therefore I cannot make any
promises.
Sorry, folks :(
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 22 Aug 2013 at 9:25
Here's a first attempt at inserting a third stage (extract WIDs from search
results, then run a multi-WID query).
Warning: very (!) quick and dirty. It's rather a workaround than a fix, but who
knows what will be next from GC...
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 22 Aug 2013 at 12:45
Attachments:
Although the workaround is functional (and therefore found its way into SVN),
it in its current form produces a lot of GC fetches - in particular, *every*
cache description page will be fetched, even if the cache will later be
excluded.
A typical search in my homezone, usually with about 500 fetches, now results in
more than twice that.
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 23 Aug 2013 at 5:35
If you don't want to harm your account, you may want to think twice before
using the current version.
As I'm sure that the recent changes will be followed by other ones soon, I
hesitate to announce the issue as "being worked on". Any input is still
welcome. -S
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 23 Aug 2013 at 6:04
Just a thought - could we instead get the GUID from
http://jeep.geocaching.com/seek/nearest.aspx instead of the traditional URL?
The "jeep" pages still use the GUID. Could then pull the cache details from the
geocaching.com "print with logs" pages as usual. The results on the "jeep" page
aren't coded the came as on geocaching.com, so the pattern matching would have
to be re-done...but if this is viable it might be a better alternative to
fetching every cache description page and then filtering out the unwanted ones.
Caveat is that the coordinate search on the "jeep" page seems to be broken;
don't know if that's temporary or not.
Original comment by theemail...@gmail.com
on 25 Aug 2013 at 11:50
Although that's an intriguing idea, I don't like it too much. (Thank you
anyway!)
jeep.gc.com seems to be a dead end, a Lost Place of web design, and may vanish
as soon as the next minion discovers that it still exists after 6 years.
If you feel challenged enough, not only by LPs "out there", you may try to:
- find an older version of GeoToad that matches the page design (from the 3.9.x
era which still may be found on archive.org)
- add a wp2guid template to it
- modify the code so "nearest.aspx" queries go to jeep.gc.com
- run a search and create wp2guid (w2g) output
- grab the guids from there and inject them into a recent GeoToad
- be happy (?)
I'm afraid this current change to gc.com won't be the last one for now, and I'm
rather hesitant to spend too much thought on short-lived "solutions" (which
will cease to be useful within a few weeks, probably).
What's currently in SVN is a workaround, at the cost of a very large number of
server accesses (a considerable risk to your account, I admit, which is
definitely a backside), but at least it's not an attempt to completely rewrite
the existing code (an advantage, at least at the moment).
The worst case I can imagine is a redesign of the "printable page" concept
(which would go below /geocache/ or somewhere else but not /seek/ any longer) -
it's been quite stable for a very long time. (Some GS minion will notice, and
change it.)
On the other hand, that would trigger a complete overhaul of GeoToad's
approach, which might bring some fresh ideas and possibilities.
I've been in this "business" for almost three years now, perhaps it's time
again for a change? Too bad that helixblue isn't affiliated with GeoToad
anymore - I'd appreciate a couple of suggestions.
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 27 Aug 2013 at 7:57
Issue 278 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 27 Aug 2013 at 7:51
There are moderately good news.
I have discovered a way to translate WIDs to GUIDs, _without_ loading (and
parsing) the cache details page (and it seems to work for PMO caches as well...)
If I find a way to do this in a resource-friendly way (maybe a YAML file, as
mappings don't change), and manage to test it thoroughly, 3.18.0 may be less
far than I thought last week.
While hope is not lost yet, I have to ask for your patience.
- S
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 5 Sep 2013 at 7:38
While working on the issue, things started to move into a different direction.
Since I - like everyone else - have accumulated a lot of "printable cache
description" (cdpf) files, which have the GUID in their names, and contain the
WID: why not extract the mapping from them, and build a "dictionary" that can
be used to look up the mappings, without any need to ask the servers? (Of
course, for new caches, this is still necessary, but much less often.)
While reverting the workarounds I had applied earlier, I found that the search
result tables wouldn't be properly parsed anymore, but that was a minor fix
that immediately went into both trunk and branch.
I'm maintaining the branch now to test the "dictionary" extension, and will
release another (even if incomplete) devel version 3.17.11 based on that. I
need feedback, and some more testing time, before I can go for 3.18.0. As
always, help is appreciated.
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 11 Sep 2013 at 9:43
3.17.11, as a pre-release for 3.18.0, seems to have closed most of the holes
which the famous HotFix ripped into GeoToad's logic and parsing.
If you don't like development releases, wait for 3.18.0 - but you've got
nothing to lose since 3.16.9 and 3.17.10 became obsolete...
Please make sure you have read the "Dictionary" wiki article - a prepared
dictionary (mapping) file will save a lot of extra requests to GS servers.
Comments, feedback, bug reports -> here (although it's a devel release), thanks
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 12 Sep 2013 at 11:38
That release retrieves also new geocaches.
Many thanks!
Original comment by geocachi...@gmail.com
on 14 Sep 2013 at 9:38
Yes, it's supposed to fetch new mappings that aren't in the dictionary yet. (I
might have come up with some instructions how to do this by hand - it's
possible, and it's basically the "magic" behind one of the two methods
implemented.)
In theory, it's also possible to get new (and old) member-only caches - the
mapping mechanism doesn't make a difference.
Thanks for your feedback (after 145 downloads, I presume _some_ quirks would
have already shown up... none did yet). I got another thumbs-up via Twitter...
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 14 Sep 2013 at 6:01
Hello, the search of caches around a position working with 3.17.11 perfectly,
(.. -x gpx -q coord "$position" -y 30km ..) so i'm the lucky to have an actual
gpx file again.
But if i run the version for my found caches
(-u myname -p mypw -o FOUND.gpx -x myfindgpx -q user "myname" -e "myname" -z)
i think only the caches are included that are loaded with the position version
before.
Example:
I logged 3 caches out of my home area with a smartphone. This one are not
included in the FOUND.gxp file. Maybe this is a little bug. But the normal
search around a position working for my.
Original comment by kipp.mic...@googlemail.com
on 15 Sep 2013 at 7:18
I added a comment in this Threat:
Issue 198: geotoad fails to load Premium caches; maybe this is inline with the mentioned #13 comment
Original comment by HeinzBro...@gmail.com
on 15 Sep 2013 at 2:56
Kipp (#13): Can you re-run the myfindgpx query again, with "-L 1" to get only
the 20 newest found caches, and perhaps "-v" to get debug output? I'm curious
what happens to the WIDs that are missing from the output file - was there a
report of "mapping", do the WIDs show up in the mapping.yaml file, any other
options in effect? (you don't use the "-Y" option, I hope?)
Try to drop the "-e" option - it's a bit of belt and braces...
Heinz (#14): I've seen, and re-opened, issue 198... please follow up there
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 16 Sep 2013 at 7:22
Kipp,
there's another very simple explanation for the behaviour you were seeing (and
if it fits, the effect should have gone by now): GeoToad caches files, the
cache descriptions for almost a week, and search results for a few hours at
least.
You may have run a query for your user name shortly before, and when running
the myfindgpx, the old cached nearest.aspx_* files hadn't expired yet... - can
you confirm?
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 16 Sep 2013 at 11:47
Hello Steve,
your simply explanation was the right!. With a new run also the caches are
found that i've missed befor.
Original comment by kipp.mic...@googlemail.com
on 17 Sep 2013 at 4:52
3.18.0 is out, closing the majority of the "HotFix" related bugs that fall into
this category.
Leaving the issue open for future discoveries.
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 24 Sep 2013 at 10:07
Closing this issue with the release of 3.18.1 - please open a new ticket if you
find something that might be related to the August HotFix.
Original comment by Steve8x8
on 21 Oct 2013 at 10:54
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Steve8x8
on 22 Aug 2013 at 7:38