Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I should also note that the plugin is not functioning. It works with the old .8
version if I force terminal into 32 bit mode.
Original comment by jma...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2009 at 5:59
These messages are probably spurious.
SIMBL is likely working correctly, but this system is not loading the this
plugin because it is not compiled for x86_64.
[mike]rogue:~> file
~/Downloads/TerminalColours.bundle/Contents/MacOS/TerminalColours
/Users/mike/Downloads/TerminalColours.bundle/Contents/MacOS/TerminalColours:
Mach-O bundle i386
[mike]rogue:~> file /Library/ScriptingAdditions/SIMBL.osax/Contents/MacOS/SIMBL
/Library/ScriptingAdditions/SIMBL.osax/Contents/MacOS/SIMBL: Mach-O universal
binary with 4 architectures
/Library/ScriptingAdditions/SIMBL.osax/Contents/MacOS/SIMBL (for architecture
i386): Mach-O bundle i386
/Library/ScriptingAdditions/SIMBL.osax/Contents/MacOS/SIMBL (for architecture
x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit bundle x86_64
/Library/ScriptingAdditions/SIMBL.osax/Contents/MacOS/SIMBL (for architecture
ppc7400): Mach-O bundle ppc
/Library/ScriptingAdditions/SIMBL.osax/Contents/MacOS/SIMBL (for architecture
ppc64): Mach-O 64-bit bundle ppc64
If you look in the system.log with Console.app, you should see the message
"InjectEventHandler". If you do, SIMBL is working correctly.
Here is how it looks on my machine:
Sep 12 11:38:08 rogue SIMBL Agent[1754]: received {\n
NSApplicationBundleIdentifier = "com.apple.Terminal";\n NSApplicationName =
Terminal;\n NSApplicationPath = "/Applications/Utilities/Terminal.app";\n
NSApplicationProcessIdentifier = 2299;\n
NSApplicationProcessSerialNumberHigh = 0;\n
NSApplicationProcessSerialNumberLow = 725169;\n NSWorkspaceApplicationKey =
<NSRunningApplication: 0x100135ce0 (com.apple.Terminal - 2299)>;\n}
Sep 12 11:38:08 rogue Terminal[2299]: Performance: Please update this scripting
addition to supply a value for ThreadSafe for each event
handler: "/Library/ScriptingAdditions/SIMBL.osax"
Sep 12 11:38:08 rogue Terminal[2299]: InjectEventHandler
Original comment by ms...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2009 at 6:39
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jma...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2009 at 5:57