stevedonovan / Lake

A Lua-based Build Tool
MIT License
132 stars 16 forks source link

How to add files created by a rule as a src to a c.program? #13

Open devurandom opened 12 years ago

devurandom commented 12 years ago

I need to generate a C file by means of a rule. This file then needs to be set as the src of a c.program.

The code (lakefile) I currently have is:

RE2C = 'utils/re2c/re2c/build/re2c'
LEMON = 'utils/lemon/lemon'

lemon_rule = rule('.y', '.c', '$(LEMON) -s $(INPUT)')
re2c_rule = rule('.re.c', '.c', '$(RE2C) -o $(TARGET) $(INPUT)')

test = c.program{
    'test',
    src={
        'src/main.c',
        lemon_rule 'src/parser.y',
        re2c_rule 'src/scanner.re.c',
    }
}

default{test}

However, this results in:

lake: ./utils/lake/lake:518: attempt to call method 'gsub' (a nil value)

How do I write this properly?

stevedonovan commented 12 years ago

Currently it is a little awkward to express this. Here's a simple scenario that works:

-- rule that converts .l to .c files
L = rule('.l','.c','lua prepro.lua $(INPUT) $(TARGET)')

-- add targets to the rule
L 'lib.l'
L 'util.l'

-- (can also say L '*.l')

SRC = L:get_targets()
SRC[#SRC+1] = 'main'

prog = c.program{'main', src = SRC }

default {prog}

It's awkward because you have to explicitly get the generated targets, and add the other source file.

Another approach is to keep the files as a string and explicitly mention them again:

-- defining a new 'language'
L = {ext='.l',obj_ext='.c'}
L.compile = 'lua prepro.lua $(INPUT) $(TARGET)'
lake.add_group(L)

LFILES = 'lib util'
lfiles = L.group{src=LFILES}

prog = c.program{'main', src = 'main '..LFILES }

default {prog}

I'm thinking of extending the definition of src so that it can contain things other than source files. Then they can also be targets, or rules (and then the get_targets is implicit).

What do you think? I'm coming out with a new version soon, so I'm interested to know what other pain points you've hit!

devurandom commented 12 years ago

It would definitely be nice if the src parameter could receive other targets directly, yes.

I am still trying to get my first Lakefile to work, so I have not yet done much with Lake.

Anyway, I have some more questions:

  1. My program consists of C and C++ sources which create one program. Do I need to create a c and a cxx library and link them together into a cxx program?
  2. Then I have to create a rule which executes multiple commands. Is there any simpler way than having to create a function that calls os.execute and utils.substitute? (s.b.)
  3. How do I specify CFLAGS? It seems defining the variable alone is not sufficient, and the cpp.program does not take a cflags parameter either…
  4. I think that the extension replacement code for rules has a bug where it does not replace the whole extension. rule('.b.c', '.c', …) applied to file 'a.b.c' creates a file 'a.b.c' instead of 'a.c'.

Anyway, this is the code I currently have (which does not work):

RE2C = 'utils/re2c/re2c/build/re2c'
LEMON = 'utils/lemon/lemon'

CFLAGS = '-I src'

lemon_c_rule = rule('.y', '.c', '$(LEMON) -s $(INPUT)')
lemon_cpp_rule = rule('.y', '.cpp', function(t)
    os.execute(utils.substitute('$(LEMON) -s $(INPUT)', {LEMON=LEMON, INPUT=t.deps[1]}))
    os.execute(utils.substitute('$(MV) $(TARGET_).c $(TARGET_).cpp', {MV='mv -f', TARGET_=t.target:gsub('\.cpp$', ''):gsub('^', 'src/')}))
end)
re2c_rule = rule('.re.c', '.c', '$(RE2C) -o $(TARGET) $(INPUT)')

lemon_cpp_rule 'src/parser.y'
re2c_rule 'src/scanner.re.c'

test_src = {'src/main'}
for i,v in ipairs(lemon_c_rule:get_targets()) do v,_ = v:gsub('^', 'src/') table.insert(test_src,v) end
for i,v in ipairs(lemon_cpp_rule:get_targets()) do v,_ = v:gsub('^', 'src/') table.insert(test_src,v) end
for i,v in ipairs(re2c_rule:get_targets()) do table.insert(test_src,v) end

test = cpp.program{
    'test',
    src=test_src,
}

default{
    test,
}
stevedonovan commented 12 years ago

I think it's easier to work on a slightly lower level, directly with targets:

LEMON='lemon'
MV='mv'
RES2C='res2c'

c_parser = target('src/parser.c','src/parser.y','$(LEMON) -s $(DEPENDS)')
cpp_parser  = target('src/parser.cpp',c_parser.target,'$(MV) $(DEPENDS) $(TARGET)')
res2c = target('src/scanner.c','src/scanner.re.c','$(RES2C) -o $(TARGET) $(DEPENDS)')

src = {cpp_parser.target, res2c.target, 'src/main'}

test = cpp.program{'test',src=src,incdir='src'}

default {test}

And this gives me with lake -t the following output (-t because I don't actually have a lemon)

lemon -s src/parser.y
mv src/parser.c src/parser.cpp
g++ -c -O1 -Wall -Isrc  -MMD  src/parser.cpp -o parser.o
res2c -o src/scanner.c src/scanner.re.c
g++ -c -O1 -Wall -Isrc  -MMD  src/scanner.c -o scanner.o
g++ -c -O1 -Wall -Isrc  -MMD  src/main.cpp -o main.o
g++ parser.o scanner.o main.o  -Wl,-s -o test.exe

Note how the include directory is specified. You can pass flags directly, but the field name is 'flags', which I admit is confusing (better to have also an alias 'cflags')

This approach is ok if you only have one of any particular kind - rules are useful for doing lots of operations that match a pattern. I suppose the moral is: when in doubt, think like Make ;)

I've had to explicitly get the target file with 't.target' but the src list will soon also understand targets directly.

As for mixed C/C++, no problem. The compiler knows what to do and just compiles everything as C++.

steve d.

devurandom commented 12 years ago
c_parser = target('src/parser.c','src/parser.y','$(LEMON) -s $(DEPENDS)')

What I just noticed: rule() and target() have their parameters in opposite order, which confused me originally when I changed from target() to rule() and the lakefile worked even less than before.

As for mixed C/C++, no problem. The compiler knows what to do and just compiles everything as C++.

That might be an issue, when e.g. mixing in C99, which afaik a C++03 compliant compiler does not need to understand. In addition: Won't compiling it as C++ mess up symbol names?

stevedonovan commented 12 years ago

What I just noticed: rule() and target() have their parameters in opposite order

Ouch. That's not a nice inconsistency.

Ah, and yes, sometimes you do need to separately compile C and C++. (there is a c99 available that forces GCC to compile as C99)

So we can partition the build in two, like so:

cfiles = c99.group{'cfiles',src='src/one src/two',incdir='src'}
cppfiles = cpp.group('cppfiles',src='src/three src/four',incdir='src'}
prog = cpp.program('test',input={cfiles,cppfiles},libs='foo'}

This separates out the compile and the link stage and allows them to be separate, with their own flags etc.