Closed federicazanca closed 5 months ago
just some small changes to make provenance and some names look better
Just to clarify, look better in what sense?
just some small changes to make provenance and some names look better
Just to clarify, look better in what sense?
Just when I was making the provenance graph for my calculations one of the reasons it looked very large and unreadable is that the singlefiledata types default the "filename" to a very long string, while now it's a name that makes more sense. see pictures (the outputs in particular)for comparison.
This PR should be only for changing the singlefiledata filename so if you are ok with those we can approve. I did some small changes in the model part that elliot was commenting but I would say if we really don't like how that's handled I open another issue about that?
just some small changes to make provenance and some names look better
Just to clarify, look better in what sense?
Just when I was making the provenance graph for my calculations one of the reasons it looked very large and unreadable is that the singlefiledata types default the "filename" to a very long string, while now it's a name that makes more sense. see pictures (the outputs in particular)for comparison.
Ok thanks. Are we still looking at consolidating the nodes at some point, separately?
is fine if explodes but shall explode with an error.
is fine if explodes but shall explode with an error.
referring to the model thing? sure, I suggest we close this and I open another pr for making the model handling a bit better (and in general I'll try to go through some similar bugs that maybe I didn't notice initially
just some small changes to make provenance and some names look better
Just to clarify, look better in what sense?
Just when I was making the provenance graph for my calculations one of the reasons it looked very large and unreadable is that the singlefiledata types default the "filename" to a very long string, while now it's a name that makes more sense. see pictures (the outputs in particular)for comparison.
Ok thanks. Are we still looking at consolidating the nodes at some point, separately?
yea I think
I've reverted the changes so this is now just the changes for the SinglefileData filenames. We should still decide about wheher to use .name.
I'll add the other changes in separate PRs.
just some small changes to make provenance and some names look better