Closed Santobert closed 5 years ago
@stianaske We can go for the babel alternative as well, but personally I prefer this way because of its robustness and cleanliness.
:tada:
Great work! Glad we're rid of the locale.
Thanks for merging. I'm happy about it as well. Are you planning to release the current version on pypi?
It should already be on pypi. If not, let me know.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019, 19:51 Santobert notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks for merging. I'm happy about it as well. Are you planning to release the current version on pypi?
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/stianaske/pybotvac/pull/52?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAILUGV3DY2PYXVZ5THME33QM57CVA5CNFSM4I4EO4EKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEAMNGKI#issuecomment-538497833, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAILUGQCBY3O757QQUT3DDLQM57CVANCNFSM4I4EO4EA .
Closes: #45
I have already mentioned two different approaches to fixing #45. After some testing this one seems to be more stable. It also looks much cleaner to me.
We want to create a timestamp according to rfc2616.
The official documentation shows an example in ruby:
The alternative approach using the babel package can be seen here: https://github.com/Santobert/pybotvac/tree/avoid_missing_locale_1