Closed urbster1 closed 5 years ago
Yeah, perhaps leaving out the song index means working memory song
I came here to add this as an issue and it's already been added! hahaha XD
Just to clarify, I definitely think we should only worry about the working memory song and not worry about requiring an index. Open to feedback on that
Well, it's already in there so why not make that opt-in for the occasional use?
Ok, wait. But right now this tool only imports into .lsdsng's, right? So what you're suggesting is another mode in which it takes in a .sav and patches into the wm song?
Yes, correct
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019, 3:16 PM Stijn Frishert notifications@github.com wrote:
Ok, wait. But right now this tool only imports into .lsdsng's, right? So what you're suggesting is another mode in which it takes in a .sav and patches into the wm song?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/stijnfrishert/liblsdj/issues/41#issuecomment-459489950, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFbBWeH0ycLULNdm_Sixd4Iv054QydcXks5vI08cgaJpZM4YQ0Q_ .
Ok, makes sense. Will do.
I just thought it would be nice if we don't bother to worry about which song we're patching into, just patch directly into whatever is in the save file working memory