Closed rorynolan closed 1 year ago
-r, --record-count <RECORD_COUNT> should be -n, --record-count <RECORD_COUNT> right? Elsewhere in the README, -n is mentioned.
-r, --record-count <RECORD_COUNT>
-n, --record-count <RECORD_COUNT>
-n
Good catch, thanks! That bug was introduced when the argument parser was updated in e7625cf4b4e477a9ecc1fd01d64b56e2c1a10ae0. It's now fixed in 7288f2a225e831e99626a3325e2ee8161085c80d.
-r, --record-count <RECORD_COUNT>
should be-n, --record-count <RECORD_COUNT>
right? Elsewhere in the README,-n
is mentioned.