Open precisioninfinity opened 2 years ago
This is a good point! The reason for this is that the START codon is always encoded as methionine in humans. This corresponds to "AUG" in the table. We also say later
the translation machinery correctly reads a start codon ("AUG" or Methionine)
and
where the functional or open reading frame is one that begins with the start codon "AUG" (resulting in the Methionine)
I think the reason for the confusion is that the START codon encodes for an amino acid to be added to the chain, so we have something to put there in the table, whereas the STOP codon does not encode for any amino acid to be added to the chain:
Most codons in messenger RNA correspond to the addition of an amino acid to a growing polypeptide chain, which may ultimately become a protein; stop codons signal the termination of this process by binding release factors, which cause the ribosomal subunits to disassociate, releasing the amino acid chain.
Ultimately, I agree it could be more clear. I probably will add (START)
to the table alongside the met
that is already there.
Yeah, I like that, I think if you had (START)
in the table alongside met
as you suggest, then I wouldn't have even questioned it.
https://learngenomics.dev/docs/biological-foundations/translation
"As shown in the amino acid lookup table below, other codons specify that translation should start or stop at a particular position." but in the table it says 'STOP' twice with no 'START'