Closed stlgolfer closed 2 years ago
I like the idea of using the --setno=
param. For every model specified, combine the set numbers in the set number param. So, --setno=0
is the default, and it just creates a single aggregate detector plot. But, if we do --setno=1,2,3
, combine sets 1,2,3 together.
Could also make --setno=-1
a wildcard for available sets.
Turns out, each model has several different progenitors, and they all have similar signatures. So, what we want to do next is to superimpose all progenitor sources onto the same author and transformation.