stlink-org / stlink

Open source STM32 MCU programming toolset
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
4.41k stars 1.24k forks source link

[feature] Nucleo-H563ZI Board not recognized #1384

Open Nightwalker-87 opened 7 months ago

Nightwalker-87 commented 7 months ago

Discussed in https://github.com/stlink-org/stlink/discussions/1381

Originally posted by **DF4OR** March 26, 2024 Hi. Beginner here. I have sucessfully used other boards (e.g. Nucleo-F091RC) with the current st-link utils on Linux. The Nucleo-H563ZI board in contrast is not properly recognized and cannot be programmed. Output of lsusb `Bus 003 Device 017: ID 0483:374e STMicroelectronics STLINK-V3` Output of st-info --probe ```Found 1 stlink programmers version: V3J10 serial: 003A001B3132511138363431 flash: 0 (pagesize: 0) sram: 0 chipid: 0x000 dev-type: unknown ``` Outout of st-info --version `v1.8.0` System * Arch Linux, kernel 6.8.1-arch1-1 * stlink utils installed with pacman Any idea what's going on? TIA, Ekki
muxelplexer commented 5 months ago

I'd be very much interested in helping on this issue as i've been trying to setup my Nucleo-H563ZI through stlink myself. Would you have any clues/guidance what is missing for this board for someone who hasn't been too involved with the codebase yet? @Nightwalker-87

As far as i've seen it should only be the flash that is not being picked up correctly? Or is it actually the Stlink-3VPWR that is throwing it off?

Nightwalker-87 commented 5 months ago

@muxelplexer Thanks for the feedback. However I'm not really sure, if I can give any useful advice here, as I am not aware of the technical specifics of this board and how they relate to certain parts in the code base. One should know that there are coexisting older and newer parts of the st-link library, which derive from different ways of implementation. This has not fully been resolved yet and I don't know if/how this affects this issue in any kind.

antoinh commented 4 months ago

I'm also interested on getting this to work with STM32H5 series. One of the quick thing I notice is that the stm32H5 requires connection on access port 1 instead of the traditional port 0 when using SWD. There might be some other changes but that is certainly a point to start with these new chips.

In ST-LINK utility or STCubeProgrammer there is such an option but I don't see this option in the open source stlink.

See this thread from ST where the ST employee mentions the connection via port1. I can also see that stm32cube programmer does the switch automatically to port1:

https://community.st.com/t5/stm32cubeide-mcus/unable-to-flash-nucleo-h563zi-with-stm32cubeide-v1-14/m-p/618423/highlight/true#M22695

image

ypearson-bdai commented 4 months ago

Any news here?

tonyh1988 commented 4 months ago

No, sorry I don't have time to investigate this further at the moment. I just thought I would comment my findings to help someone that might want to dive deeper into this eventually or maybe even myself if I want to dive deeper on this later

tonyh1988 commented 4 months ago

That being said the stm32cube programmer command line interface is freely available and should in theory work with STM32H5. I will need to investigate this further until the open source stlink driver catch up with these newer MCUs.

Nightwalker-87 commented 1 month ago

We are still waiting for any constructive input here...