Closed chirino closed 13 years ago
I'm in favor of leaving whitespace alone in future versions of the STOMP spec, but to maintain backwards compatibility in the 1.1 spec, perhaps we should save this change for 2.0?
I don't agree. I think this needs to get clarified since there is ambiguity in the 1.0 specification. With the way that 1.1 does protocol negotiation, it's easy to tell if your talking to a 1.1 client/server or a 1.0 version, so client and server can easily implement backward compatible trimming of headers if need.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Tim Fox tim.fox@jboss.com wrote:
Another observation that came up when implementing the STOMP 1.0 spec.
1.0 specifies that headers take the format:.
However in practice it seems some implementations expect that