stooged
commented
1 month ago More lines on the debug output isnt going to change the success rate. If the windows one is quicker then its probably best to use that.
The pppwn exploit is what it is and the c++ port will probably always run better on windows.
is it normal that these 3 steps go INSTANTLY? And not step-by-step? I understand that the new C++ is faster, but the Windows tool still does them line by line and the Router tool does them on the same line but goes through all the percentage values.
[] Heap grooming...0% [] Heap grooming...6% [] Heap grooming...12% [] Heap grooming...18% [] Heap grooming...25% [] Heap grooming...31% [] Heap grooming...37% [] Heap grooming...43% [] Heap grooming...50% [] Heap grooming...56% [] Heap grooming...62% [] Heap grooming...68% [] Heap grooming...75% [] Heap grooming...81% [] Heap grooming...87% [] Heap grooming...93% [+] Heap grooming...done
[] Pinning to CPU 0...00% [] Pinning to CPU 0...06% [] Pinning to CPU 0...12% [] Pinning to CPU 0...18% [] Pinning to CPU 0...25% [] Pinning to CPU 0...31% [] Pinning to CPU 0...37% [] Pinning to CPU 0...43% [] Pinning to CPU 0...50% [] Pinning to CPU 0...56% [] Pinning to CPU 0...62% [] Pinning to CPU 0...68% [] Pinning to CPU 0...75% [] Pinning to CPU 0...81% [] Pinning to CPU 0...87% [] Pinning to CPU 0...93% [+] Pinning to CPU 0...done
[] Scanning for corrupted object... 0xf00 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0xe00 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0xd00 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0xc00 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0xb00 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0xa00 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0x900 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0x800 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0x700 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0x600 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0x500 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0x400 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0x300 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0x200 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0x100 [] Scanning for corrupted object... 0x000 [-] Scanning for corrupted object...failed.
PI-Pwn has the worst success rate for me. It takes 5-15 tries for me and IF it gets successfully "pppwn-ed", it doesn't show the GoldHEN message (yes, v2.4b17.2 it's already installed on the console) and freezes/reboots/black screen in a few seconds. The Windows PPPwd GUI (moded warfare) does the trick in 2-3 tries and no problems. The Router option (xfangfang - arm-linux-musleabi(mpcorenovfp) - in my case) did the trick the first go.
Last week (prior to some updates) it worked better/more stable.
Thank you, M.